Tyler’s classmates and the neighborhood are very shocked that Tyler would be first and foremost involved in this at all if it like they’re not saying he couldn’t have been involved, but rather that there’s no way he could have acted alone, that this had to be a part of some wider plot. Okay. Candace Owens has warned that Tyler Robinson might be innocent, or at least not acting alone.

Now, in a jaw-dropping courtroom moment, Tyler has broken his silence, apologizing and exposing the people he was protecting and revealing the real killer behind Charlie’s death. Who’s really pulling the strings and what’s next? I’ve got the full story. Let’s get into it. The official story unravels. On September 10th, 2025, the conservative movement lost one of its most prominent voices when Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University.

The 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA was addressing students as part of his Prove Me Wrong campus tour when a single bullet struck him in the neck, ending his life in front of thousands of witnesses and millions more who watched the graphic footage spread across social media. Where should we begin? I’ll tell you this. Something is not right.

Something is not right. And I am going to need you, whoever it is that’s listening to this podcast right now, to wake up. Within 33 hours, authorities had their man, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who surrendered to police, accompanied by his parents and a family friend. The case seemed open and shut. Robinson was charged with aggravated murder based on what prosecutors called overwhelming evidence.

DNA consistent with Robinson found on the rifle trigger, confessional text messages to his roommate, and a handwritten note stating, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m going to take it.” But as the dust settled and investigators released more details, cracks began to appear in what should have been a straightforward case.

The precision of the shot, the suspicious timing of certain events, and inconsistencies in the evidence have led some to question whether Tyler Robinson acted alone or whether he acted at all. So, we’ve been wondering. Yesterday, I was also doing a set an Instagram series pulling everybody into what doesn’t make sense about the changing of the clothes that Tyler Robinson allegedly did.

The official timeline paints Robinson as a calculated killer who planned the assassination for over a week. According to court documents, surveillance footage shows Robinson arriving on the UVU campus in a gray Dodge Challenger at approximately 8:29 a.m. wearing a maroon t-shirt, light colored shorts, and a black hat.

The footage allegedly shows him walking with an unusual gate, consistent with a rifle being hidden in his pants before crossing a railing and dropping onto a rooftop at 12:15 p.m. 8 minutes later at 12:23 p.m. Charlie Kirk was dead. But here’s where the story gets interesting and where serious questions begin to emerge about what really happened that day.

He mentioned that the cops have done a sweep. remember uh Tyler is supposed to be uh babysitting the gun in that moment, waiting for the right moment to go back and quote unquote retrieve his weapon. The first red flag came from the ballistics evidence. Expert analysis suggested that the wound size didn’t match what would be expected from a 3006 rifle fired from the alleged distance.

Even more puzzling, there was reportedly no exit wound despite the high velocity nature of the ammunition. This detail alone has ballistics experts scratching their heads, as such rounds typically create devastating exit wounds when fired from close to medium range. The text messages that supposedly sealed Robinson’s fate have also come under intense scrutiny.

These messages, described by critics across the political spectrum as scripted and federally written, lack crucial timestamps and context. Conservative commentator Candace Owens, who had worked closely with Kirk at Turning Point USA, became one of the most vocal critics of the official narrative. Yeah, these messages are clearly doctorred is what I would say.

They’re doctorred. Now, they could decide why they’re doing that. Tyler’s being, you know, forthcoming. We’re protecting him in some capacity. I find that to be unacceptable. The inconsistencies don’t stop there. Perhaps most damning to the official narrative is a photograph that surfaced showing Robinson at a Dairy Queen at 6:38 p.m.

on the day of the shooting about 15 minutes away from the campus appearing calm and collected while allegedly evading a massive manhunt. Here is that photo that we can show you. Take a look at this photo. What is wrong with this picture? A lot is wrong with this picture. First and foremost, this image raises serious questions about the official timeline.

If Robinson was indeed the shooter who had just committed one of the most high-profile assassinations in recent American history, why was he calmly ordering food at a fast food restaurant instead of fleeing the state or going into hiding? The photograph shows him wearing a combination of both outfits he allegedly wore that day, the maroon shirt from the morning and jeans from the shooting, which contradicts the narrative that he completely changed clothes to avoid detection.

Also, wow, you must have quite the stomach. You don’t have a record. Next thing you know, you shoot someone and you’re like, I’m just going to go have a meal. You don’t seem to be too shaken or too upset. The choice of language in the alleged text messages has also raised eyebrows among investigators and observers.

In one message, Robinson allegedly wrote about changing outfits, a term that multiple analysts have noted is typically used by women, not men. Male suspects in similar cases typically refer to changing clothes, making this linguistic choice stand out as potentially significant. He says to Lance allegedly, quote, I worry about Prince.

I had to leave it, referring to the rifle, in a bush where I changed outfits. Wait, changed outfits? Somebody commented, “Men don’t say outfits. That’s a woman thing.” Another concerning detail is Robinson’s use of law enforcement terminology in the messages. When describing police presence near where he allegedly hid the weapon, Robinson refers to a squad car, terminology more commonly used by law enforcement officers than civilians, who typically say police car or cop car.

The investigation itself has been marked by unusual federal involvement from the very beginning. Local authorities were quickly sidelined as federal agencies took control of the case, leading to speculation about why such heavy federal involvement was necessary for what appeared to be a straightforward local crime.

And that’s why I would say 910 is beginning to remind me of 9/11, right? The feds sweep through everything to make sure that they have all of the footage so that no one can question the narrative that they put out. It makes me think the handling of evidence has also raised questions. Multiple local sources reported that any footage they had was immediately collected by federal authorities with warnings not to share it publicly.

This comprehensive evidence sweep has limited independent analysis of the events, forcing the public to rely primarily on officially released materials. The circumstances surrounding the surrender of Robinson also contain peculiarities. According to the official account, Robinson’s parents recognized him from surveillance photos released by authorities and convinced him to turn himself in.

However, Robinson reportedly maintained his innocence and claimed he had never even been to the UVU campus. Perhaps most troubling is the apparent disconnect between Robinson’s alleged criminal sophistication and his supposed mistakes. The official narrative describes a killer skilled enough to access a secured rooftop, position himself perfectly for a long range shot, and execute the assassination with military precision.

Yet, this same individual allegedly left behind a treasure trove of incriminating evidence, including DNA on the weapon. detailed confessional text messages and a handwritten note explicitly stating his intentions. Looking at a timeline, I like a clean timeline. We said the first correspondence that allegedly took place between these two had to have taken place between Tyler and Lance after 6:00 p.m.

Well, there we go. 6:38 p.m. We get this confirmed photo, or I should say, I shouldn’t say a confirmed photo, an alleged photo of Tyler Robinson buying food at Dairy Queen off campus on the other side of town. And that’s where this combination of criminal expertise and amateur mistakes has led some investigators to question whether Robinson was the actual shooter or if he was deliberately set up to take the fall for someone else’s crime.

The precision required for the fatal shot combined with the seemingly scripted nature of the evidence left behind paints a picture that doesn’t quite add up for many observers. the real motives and hidden pressures. To understand who might have wanted Charlie Kirk dead, we need to examine the intense pressures and conflicts he was facing in the months leading up to his assassination.

What emerges is a picture of a man caught between competing forces, facing threats from multiple directions that had nothing to do with Tyler Robinson. I my contention here is that some in the pro-Israel camp are so kneejerk about calling you anti-semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn’t align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause.

And I have to tell you, in the weeks before his death, Charlie Kirk had been engaged in an increasingly public battle with some of his most influential donors and supporters. The conflict centered around his evolving views on Israel and his willingness to platform controversial figures like Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith at TurningPoint USA events.

The tension came to a head during what attendees described as an intervention at a Hampton’s retreat hosted by billionaire Bill Aman in early August 2025. Kirk was reportedly pressured by major donors to modify his positions on Israel and to distance himself from certain speakers. According to sources who attended the event, Kirk felt blackmailed by offers of substantial funding contingent on his compliance with pro-Israel talking points.

I can tell you right now from the energy that is coming out of him, the energy that is coming out of Megan is where I was 2 years ago. Okay, I’ve been there. You can’t you can’t even lie to you can’t even attempt to lie to me about what is pouring off of both of them. The pressure Kirk was experiencing becomes clear when we examine his appearance on Megan Kelly’s show just one day after the Hampton’s meeting.

The timing is significant. Bill Aman himself confirmed that the retreat took place on August 4th and 5th and Kirk appeared on Kelly’s show on August 6th, clearly agitated and frustrated. I’m so glad you brought this up and I would second that, Megan. I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media to to great, you know, let’s just say mockery and scorn at times where I cuz I believe it, right? I I believe.

In this interview, Kirk openly discussed the pressure he was facing from pro-Israel advocates who would immediately label any criticism as anti-Semitic. His frustration was palpable as he described receiving text messages calling him an anti-Semite despite his extensive support for Israel and his personal study of Hebrew.

The financial pressure on Kirk and Turning Point USA was intense and multifaceted. Major donor Robert Schillman reportedly terminated his support for Kirk just days before the assassination, representing a significant blow to the organization’s funding. This wasn’t an isolated incident. Multiple sources within Turning Point USA reported that Kirk had expressed serious concerns about the organization’s finances in the week leading up to his death.

Also, Turning Point employees are contacting me, a lot of them, okay? And I am not liking what I am hearing from them about things that took place leading up to that Hampton’s event, some changes uh at the organization in the months leading up to that event and what had been happening more broadly at the company over the last year.

The internal situation at Turning Point USA was apparently deteriorating rapidly. Kirk had planned to conduct a comprehensive financial audit of the organization, potentially exposing irregularities in how donor funds were being managed. This audit, scheduled to begin shortly after his death, represented a significant threat to anyone who might have been misappropriating funds or using the organization for purposes beyond its stated mission.

The pressure wasn’t limited to financial matters. Kirk was also facing intense criticism for his speaker choices and his willingness to engage with controversial figures. The decision to feature Tucker Carlson at America Fest and other Turning Point events had generated significant push back from donors and board members.

Some viewed Carlson’s increasingly critical stance towards certain aspects of US foreign policy as problematic for an I organization that relied heavily on donations from supporters of traditional Republican foreign policy positions. Now, the the thing that Candace is not saying, and I don’t understand why she’s leaving this out of this, cuz she mentioned this in a previous episode, is that they showed her that footage.

The person got on a call with her and showed her that footage. So, she has seen that footage. But perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the pressure campaign against Kirk was what can only be described as psychological warfare. Just two weeks before his assassination, the far-left website Jezebel declared a mission to cast a curse on Kirk, hiring practitioners on Etsy to perform hex’s against him.

While this might seem like internet trolling, the psychological impact on Kirk and his wife Erica was significant enough that they consulted with a Catholic priest for spiritual protection. A curse that was put on Charlie just before he went out to UVU. I learned when I was out in Arizona last week that two weeks before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, the far-left website Jezebel declared that it had a mission to cast bad luck or a curse on Charlie.

They wanted to hurt him in some way. The combination of financial pressure, donor revolt, internal organizational conflicts, and what can only be described as spiritual warfare created a perfect storm around Kirk in the final weeks of his life. He was a man under siege from multiple directions, facing threats to his livelihood, his organization, and even his spiritual well-being.

What makes this situation even more concerning is the response after Kirk’s death. Several of the same donors who had been pressuring him immediately reversed course, suddenly praising his support for Israel and downplaying any tensions that had existed. This rapid 180° turn has raised questions about whether these individuals knew something about Kirk’s fate in advance.

The federal government’s immediate takeover of the investigation also suggests that Kirk’s death was seen as more than just a local crime. The heavy federal involvement from day one indicates that authorities understood this assassination had implications beyond a single disturbed individual acting alone. Perhaps most telling is what didn’t happen after Kirk’s death.

Despite the massive investigation and the supposed clear evidence against Tyler Robinson, the FBI has been actively pressuring Utah authorities to close the case and declare it solved. This urgency to wrap up the investigation runs counter to normal procedure for such a high-profile case and suggests that certain parties are eager to prevent further scrutiny of the circumstances surrounding Kirk’s death.

The pattern that emerges is one of a coordinated campaign to silence a increasingly independent voice within the conservative movement. Kirk’s willingness to question certain aspects of US foreign policy, his openness to controversial speakers, and his plans to audit his own organization’s finances had made him dangerous to powerful interests.

Whether those interests include foreign governments, domestic political operators, or simply corrupt individuals within his own organization remains an open question. What’s clear is that Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old with no apparent connections to any of these power struggles, seems an unlikely candidate to have orchestrated such a sophisticated operation.

The precision of the assassination, combined with the immediate federal response and the pressure to close the case quickly, suggests a level of planning and coordination far beyond what a lone gunman could have achieved. I want to remind you guys we should take a look at their current case against Tyler Robinson to see if we should accept this narrative because currently there is absolutely no video which shows Tyler Robinson firing the weapon or even taking aim at Charlie Kirk.

In fact, as we examine the evidence more closely, it becomes apparent that the real motives for Kirk’s assassination lie not with Tyler Robinson’s alleged grievances, but with the powerful forces that were systematically working to control or eliminate Kirk’s influence within the conservative movement. The question is no longer whether Robinson pulled the trigger, but who orchestrated the operation and why they chose him as their full guy.

the cover up and alternative theories. As the official investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination has progressed, a disturbing pattern of evidence suppression, witness intimidation, and narrative control has emerged. What began as questions about Tyler Robinson’s guilt has evolved into a broader examination of whether we’re witnessing one of the most sophisticated cover-ups in recent American history.

The most glaring issue with the official narrative is the complete absence of video evidence showing Robinson actually firing the weapon. Despite the heavy surveillance presence at the event and multiple camera angles, no footage exists showing Robinson taking aim or pulling the trigger. This absence is particularly troubling given that virtually every other aspect of the alleged timeline has been documented through surveillance footage.

In fact, the individual who filmed the footage of the shooter on the roof, the lone video that exists of the shooter on the roof, also told me that he doesn’t think that Tyler Robinson is the guy. Even more damning is the testimony of the individual who captured the only known footage of a shooter on the rooftop. This eyewitness who has experience with firearms and teaches gun safety has stated definitively that the person he observed was wearing tactical gear, not the casual clothing Robinson was allegedly wearing. Furthermore, this

witness maintains that the weapon he observed doesn’t match the rifle supposedly used by Robinson. The ballistics evidence presents perhaps the most significant challenge to the official narrative. The reported lack of an exit wound from a high velocity 3006 round has led some investigators to propose alternative theories about how Kirk was actually killed.

One theory suggests that the fatal shot may have come from an underground tunnel or maintenance area behind the stage rather than from the rooftop position Robinson allegedly occupied. The physical evidence itself is problematic. Sources close to the investigation have revealed that authorities don’t actually know how the rifle got onto the rooftop and the bullet was too fragmented to definitively match Robinson’s weapon.

These are fundamental gaps in the evidence that would typically prevent prosecutors from moving forward with a case. Yet, the charges against Robinson have proceeded anyway. The crime scene handling has also raised serious questions. Witnesses reported that the area was quickly renovated and cleaned with droploths and other potential evidence removed before a thorough forensic examination could be completed.

This rapid cleanup is highly unusual for a crime scene of this magnitude and suggests a deliberate effort to eliminate evidence that might contradict the official narrative. Let me just say this right away. As a rule, when a tragedy happens, I don’t love the people who have the instinct to immediately speak to the press after a tragedy.

What I mean to say is that imagine you, you’re on campus somewhere, a shooting happens, students are screaming, they’re running, somebody is dead. I feel that a normal person’s instinct is to make sure their loved ones are okay in their immediate vicinity. Make sure they are okay obviously and then to call and alert everyone who would be concerned that you’re okay, right? Maybe your mom text like you’re going to get on the phone first with like your mom and dad.

You’re not going to get on the phone with TMZ. You’re not going to get in the you’re going to speak to the press first? I don’t think so. The behavior of certain witnesses has also been suspicious. The doorbell camera footage that was quickly provided to TMZ came from a family with connections to Calera Engineering, a company that manufactures valves and whose employees reportedly make up most of a residential block near the university.

The rapid provision of this footage to a Hollywood gossip outlet rather than to local authorities first suggests a coordinated media strategy. Perhaps most concerning is the pattern of federal interference in what should have been a local investigation. From the moment Kirk was shot, federal agencies moved quickly to take control of the case, sidelining local authorities and establishing strict control over information flow.

This level of federal involvement is highly unusual for a case involving a single shooter with no apparent terrorism connections. Well, I have it now on a very wellplaced authority authoritative source that the FBI is putting an absurd amount of pressure right now on the authorities in Utah and also the rest of the government in Utah to come out and to say that the Charlie Kirk case is closed.

The pressure to close the case quickly has intensified in recent weeks. Sources within Utah law enforcement report that the FBI is actively pressuring state authorities to declare the case solved and to stop any further investigation. This urgency to wrap up the investigation runs counter to normal procedure and suggest that certain parties are eager to prevent further scrutiny.

The alternative theories that have emerged paint a picture of a sophisticated operation designed to eliminate Kirk while providing a convenient scapegoat. Local sources in Utah have proposed that Robinson was instructed to simply drop off his rifle at a predetermined location, serving as an unwitting participant in a larger scheme.

According to this theory, the actual shooter was a professional who used the vacant universityowned property near where the weapon was found as a safe house. They are telling me that something which you will recall the first people that got out the map of everywhere to look and this is where the shooter walked and this is what happened and you know here’s our diagram of where everything took place and he ran into the woods and he grabbed the gun but we’re not really getting too many details about where he got that gun from. We’re just kind of told in the

woods. This theory explains several puzzling aspects of the case, including how Robinson could appear so calm at the Dairy Queen hours after allegedly committing murder, why the ballistics don’t match the alleged weapon, and how such a sophisticated operation could have been planned and executed by a 22-year-old with no apparent military or intelligence training.

The involvement of Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twigs, has also raised questions. Twig’s family members have expressed skepticism about the official narrative and have suggested that he may have been compromised or threatened. They describe a pattern of unusual behavior and possible substance abuse issues that could have made him vulnerable to manipulation.

Lance um they told us went to live with his relatives. So no longer in the house with his mother and father again. Allegedly, allegedly allegedly his parents kicked him out junior year of high school because he was problematic. He just had issues. The rapid response of certain media figures and political operatives after Kirk’s death has also been telling.

The immediate effort to control the narrative and discredit anyone questioning the official story suggests a coordinated campaign that was prepared well in advance. The speed and coordination of these responses indicates planning that goes far beyond what would be expected for a random act of violence.

The systematic effort to discredit investigators and witnesses who have raised questions about the official narrative has been particularly aggressive. Attempts to silence critics through legal threats, character assassination, and financial pressure have been deployed with remarkable speed and coordination. This response pattern is more consistent with protecting a carefully constructed cover story than with simply defending the truth.

The technical aspects of the alleged crime also don’t add up. The precision required for the fatal shot, the knowledge needed to access the rooftop without triggering alarms, and the sophisticated planning evident in the operation all point to professional involvement. These elements are inconsistent with a lone gunman acting on personal grievances.

Perhaps most disturbing is the apparent fornowledge of the attack that some individuals may have possessed. Reports of unusual, preient feelings and warnings in the days leading up to the assassination suggest that certain people may have been aware that something was planned. The spiritual and psychological warfare campaign against Kirk in the weeks before his death may have been designed to create the perfect psychological conditions for the assassination.

The pattern that emerges from examining all the evidence is one of a carefully orchestrated operation designed to eliminate a threat to powerful interests while providing a convenient explanation that would satisfy the public and prevent further investigation. Tyler Robinson appears to have been selected as the perfect psy, young, isolated, and vulnerable to manipulation or coercion.

And I am focused. Trevor Miller writes, “Something is wrong. It’s time to unify as a country and fix this. Yes, I am calling on the left and the right to unify and to solve what happened on September 10th.” Okay. All of us, left and right. The assassination of Charlie Kirk represents more than just the murder of a political activist.

It appears to be a sophisticated operation designed to send a message to anyone who might challenge certain powerful interests within the American political system. The speed and efficiency with which the coverup has been implemented suggests resources and coordination that go far beyond what any single individual or organization could muster.

As more evidence emerges and more witnesses come forward, the official narrative becomes increasingly untenable. The question is no longer whether Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk, but whether the American people will demand a real investigation into who actually orchestrated this assassination and why they felt the need to eliminate one of the conservative movement’s most prominent voices.

The truth about September 10th, 2025 may ultimately reveal uncomfortable realities about power, corruption, and control in contemporary America. But until we have that truth, Charlie Kirk’s death will stand as a stark reminder of what happens to those who dare to challenge the wrong people at the wrong time. Thank you for watching.

If you enjoyed watching this video, click on one of the boxes playing on your screen to watch more similar content.