Lin Dunn Bashes Brittney Griner for Gold Medal Behavior: “You Only Stood Up When It Benefited You, Stay Away from This Country”
In the aftermath of Team USA’s thrilling victory in the women’s basketball finals at the 2024 Paris Olympics, a storm of controversy has erupted, overshadowing what should have been a moment of national pride. The source of this controversy? None other than Brittney Griner, the towering center who played a crucial role in securing the gold medal for the United States. However, it wasn’t her on-court performance that grabbed headlines but rather her actions during the medal ceremony that have sparked intense debate and sharp criticism.
Lin Dunn, a legendary figure in women’s basketball with decades of experience as both a coach and a mentor, did not mince words in her public criticism of Griner. Known for her no-nonsense approach and deep-rooted love for the sport, Dunn took particular issue with Griner’s decision to stand for the national anthem during the ceremony—something Griner had previously refused to do in protest against racial injustice in America.
“You only stood up when you yourself got the benefit,” Dunn said in a statement that has since gone viral across social media platforms. “You have no love for this country. Stay away.”
Griner’s decision to kneel during the national anthem in the past was part of a larger movement among athletes to protest police brutality and systemic racism in the United States. Her stance had made her a polarizing figure, with some applauding her courage to take a stand (or in this case, a knee) for what she believed in, while others criticized her for what they perceived as a lack of patriotism. The controversy reached new heights when, after securing the gold medal, Griner chose to stand for the anthem—a move that many, including Dunn, saw as hypocritical.
Dunn, who has been an influential voice in women’s basketball for decades, coaching teams in both the NCAA and WNBA, has a storied history of advocating for athletes. Her sharp rebuke of Griner’s actions has added a new dimension to the ongoing debate about the role of athletes in political and social issues. For Dunn, it wasn’t just about Griner’s actions on the court but her perceived inconsistency in standing for the anthem only when it seemed beneficial to her personally.
“You can’t have it both ways,” Dunn continued. “You can’t protest the country one moment and then stand up with pride when you get something out of it. That’s not how it works. If you don’t love this country, stay away.”
Dunn’s comments have ignited a firestorm of responses from all sides. On social media, the debate rages on, with some users defending Griner’s right to change her mind and make her own decisions about when and why to stand for the anthem. Others, however, have echoed Dunn’s sentiments, accusing Griner of only standing for the anthem because it was advantageous in the moment.
The controversy has also spilled over into the sports world, with athletes, coaches, and commentators weighing in. Some have pointed out that Griner’s decision to stand for the anthem after winning gold could be seen as a sign of unity and reconciliation, an acknowledgment of her country’s role in her success. Others argue that it diminishes the sincerity of her previous protests, making them seem more like a performance than a deeply held belief.
Griner herself has yet to make a public statement in response to Dunn’s comments, but those close to the athlete suggest that she is deeply hurt by the accusations. According to sources, Griner feels that her decision to stand for the anthem was misunderstood and that she was simply trying to find a balance between her personal beliefs and her pride in representing her country on the world stage.
As the debate continues, it raises broader questions about the intersection of sports and politics, the role of athletes in social movements, and the expectations placed on public figures. Can an athlete protest their country’s policies while still expressing pride in representing that country? And where is the line between personal belief and public duty?
For now, Brittney Griner remains at the center of this storm, her actions scrutinized by fans, critics, and fellow athletes alike. Whether this controversy will impact her career or change public perception of her remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the conversation around patriotism, protest, and the role of athletes in social change is far from over.
News
Napheesa Collier BLAMES Angel Reese for UNRIVALED Viewership & ASKS Caitlin Clark To Join UNRIVALED!
Napheesa Collier BLAMES Angel Reese for UNRIVALED Viewership & ASKS Caitlin Clark To Join UNRIVALED! In an explosive statement that…
Lady Gamecocks Chloe Kitts Gives Up First Class Seat For Old Woman, Then The Unbelievable Happens! In a world where kindness often goes unnoticed, University of South Carolina women’s basketball star Chloe Kitts proved that small acts of generosity can lead to the most unexpected rewards…
Lady Gamecocks Chloe Kitts Gives Up First Class Seat For Old Woman, Then The Unbelievable Happens! In a world where…
BREAKING NEWS! Carly Wins Custody, Willow Loses Everything—ABC General Hospital Spoilers SHOCK Fans! In a Jaw-Dropping Turn of Events, Carly Comes Out on Top in the Custody Battle, Leaving Willow with Nothing!
Welcome back to the channel. Today, we delve into one of Port Charles’s most emotionally charged legal battles— custody war that has shaken families, friendships, and futures. At the center are two beloved children, Wiley (Wy) and Amelia, and the adults fighting over them: Willow Tate and her devoted ally Drew Cain on one side, and Carly Spencer and Michael Corinthos—Willow’s former husband and longtime co-parent—on the other. What began as a quiet question of custody soon spiraled into a courtroom war filled with betrayal, infidelity, shifting alliances, and a final ruling that left Willow reeling… until one life-altering discovery turned the entire saga on its head. Welcome back to the channel. Today, we delve into one of Port Charles’s most emotionally charged legal battles— custody war that has shaken families, friendships, and futures. At the center are two beloved children, Wiley (Wy) and Amelia, and the adults fighting over them: Willow Tate and her devoted ally Drew Cain on one side, and Carly Spencer and Michael Corinthos—Willow’s former husband and longtime co-parent—on the other. What began as a quiet question of custody soon spiraled into a courtroom war filled with betrayal, infidelity, shifting alliances, and a final ruling that left Willow reeling… until one life-altering discovery turned the entire saga on its head. Drew Cain: Willow’s Fierce Defender and Legal Architect Though controversy has never strayed far from either Willow or Drew, the two stood united as the legal challenge mounted. Drew threw himself into Willow’s defense with unshakable commitment, beginning with a bold strategic move: hiring Rick Lansing, one of Port Charles’s most formidable young attorneys. Lansing, known for his razor-sharp cross-examinations and aggressive tactics, agreed to take on Willow’s case pro bono. He believed in her cause and was determined to fight for her right to stay connected with her children. This move put Carly and Michael on high alert. With Rick on the case, they knew they’d need a counterbalance of equal or greater legal weight—and they found it in Diane Miller. Diane Miller Returns to the Courtroom with a Vengeance With Michael undergoing burn rehabilitation in Germany and unable to be physically present, Carly took on the fight with the support of her trusted friend and legal powerhouse, Diane Miller. Diane, as brilliant as she is relentless, quickly assembled a case that painted Carly and Michael’s home as the only source of consistency and security for the children. Diane’s arguments were twofold: Carly and Michael’s home was stable, financially secure, and supported by an extended network of family. Willow had displayed emotional instability—most damningly, through her intimate involvement with Drew before her divorce from Michael was finalized. Infidelity as a Legal Weapon It was Diane who uncovered the bombshell that turned the courtroom upside down. A trove of texts, emails, and eyewitness testimony revealed that Willow and Drew’s relationship had turned romantic while she was still legally married to Michael. Diane didn’t hold back. In court, she framed Willow’s actions not just as betrayal—but as evidence of moral compromise and poor judgment. Rick Lansing countered forcefully. He reminded the court of Willow’s deep love and dedication to both children, her sacrifices, and her role as a nurturing mother. But in the end, it wasn’t enough. A Shattering Verdict Judge Bernie Abrahams delivered a ruling that stunned the courtroom: full legal custody of Wiley and Amelia would remain with Carly and Michael. Willow would be granted only supervised visitation—pending a sustained period of emotional stability and demonstrated personal growth. As the gavel struck, Willow’s world collapsed. Tears streaming, she clung to Drew, barely able to stand under the weight of her heartbreak….
Shocking Secrets Unveiled: Who Are Karoline Leavitt’s Mysterious Older Brothers? Why Is Her Sister Completely Ignored? Dive Into the Hidden Family Drama and Uncover the Untold Stories of Her Siblings in This Eye-Opening Reveal!…..read more
Shocking Secrets Unveiled: Who Are Karoline Leavitt’s Mysterious Older Brothers? Why Is Her Sister Completely Ignored? Dive Into the Hidden…
Karoline Leavitt Demands Boycott of ‘The View’ LIVE On Air—Fans Erupt in Cheers, Flood Social Media With Praise: “Finally Someone Said It!” The Tension Was Palpable as Karoline Leavitt Delivered a Blistering Takedown of The View LIVE, Calling for a Nationwide Boycott That Had Fans Cheering Across the Country!
A fiery on-air exchange between White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and the co-hosts of ABC’s daytime talk show The…
Karoline Leavitt Says ‘TOO LATE!’ – $800M Lawsuit Against Judge Who Fined Her Will Move Forward! 😱 In a fiery turn of events, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made it crystal clear: “TOO LATE!” Her defiant words come as confirmation that the explosive $800 million lawsuit against the judge who fined her is not going away.👇
Cross in Court: How Caroline Levit Sparked a Movement for Religious Freedom For decades, Judge Charles Hargrove was the embodiment…
End of content
No more pages to load