“We Have the Documents” – Tom Homan Says Ilhan Omar Is Under Investigation for Immigration Fraud

Former ICE Director Tom Homan stirred significant political attention this week after asserting that Representative Ilhan Omar is currently under investigation for alleged immigration fraud. His remarks, delivered during a recent media appearance, reignited long-running accusations about Omar’s past and added new fuel to a controversy that has persisted for nearly a decade.

Homan claimed that investigators “have the documents” and are actively reviewing immigration records connected to Omar’s early years in the United States. While he did not specify which agency is leading the purported inquiry, he suggested that a specialist in immigration-fraud cases has “already examined” parts of her file. His statements, though unverified by official sources, quickly circulated among commentators and political figures who have previously raised concerns about Omar’s background.

The allegations surrounding Omar trace back to claims that she entered into a fraudulent marriage in 2009. Critics allege that the marriage may have involved a relative and was used to assist with immigration benefits and academic opportunities. These accusations were amplified by various watchdog groups, which for years have pressed for deeper investigations into possible marriage fraud, perjury, or misuse of federal forms.

Despite the persistence of these claims, no U.S. law-enforcement agency has publicly confirmed filing charges against Omar. Multiple past reviews—formal and informal—failed to produce documented indictments or findings of criminal wrongdoing. This makes Homan’s new assertions both notable and controversial: they imply activity behind the scenes, yet remain unsupported by public records.

For her part, Representative Omar has consistently denied all accusations, calling them politically motivated attacks rooted in misinformation and prejudice. She has long argued that the allegations serve as tools for opponents seeking to discredit her career and undermine the broader Somali-American community. Omar’s supporters emphasize that no court has substantiated any fraud claims and that repeating unverified accusations contributes to harassment and targeted disinformation.

Political analysts note that Homan’s remarks come at a moment of heightened tension around immigration policy and rising anti-immigrant sentiment. Some observers believe his comments may be aimed at energizing political bases by linking a high-profile progressive lawmaker to alleged misconduct. Others suggest that even the appearance of an active investigation could be used strategically in election-season messaging.

Still, the legal reality remains unchanged: without public confirmation from federal authorities, any investigation described by Homan exists only in speculation. Experts caution that while claims of fraud garner attention, U.S. legal standards require concrete, admissible evidence before charges can be filed. Until such evidence is shown, the situation remains in the realm of allegation rather than established fact.

Nevertheless, the controversy underscores ongoing political divisions over immigration, identity, and accountability. Whether Homan’s claims foreshadow formal action—or simply revive old disputes—will depend on what, if anything, federal investigators ultimately choose to confirm. For now, the debate continues, fueled by a mixture of long-standing accusations, new comments, and an absence of official clarity.