Their concerns reportedly fell on deaf ears at Warner Bros., the studio behind the show. Tensions escalated quickly. Instead of continuing to work while attorneys negotiated, Tom and John exited the series before the sixth season. Their absence sent shockwaves through both the industry and the show’s fanbase. Warner Bros., determined to move forward, hired Byron Cherry and Christopher Mayer as Coy and Vance Duke, cousins of Bo and Luke, to carry the show forward.

Fans revolted almost immediately. Viewers tuned in with high hopes but were vocal about their disappointment. Letters poured into CBS and Warner Bros., pleading for the return of the original Duke boys. Ratings fell hard. At the time, the show ranked among the top 10 on television, but during Tom and John’s absence, it dropped significantly, failing to capture the magic that defined the earlier seasons.

Behind the scenes, the situation worsened. Warner Bros. filed a counter-lawsuit against the actors, escalating the conflict. The studio had expected to weather the storm, but the replacement characters struggled to establish chemistry with the remaining cast. Even loyal fans admitted something essential was missing. The heart of “The Dukes of Hazzard” had always been Bo and Luke, their rebellious charm, deep bond, and signature stunts in the General Lee.

After nearly five months of legal negotiations and declining ratings, a settlement was reached. The details were locked under confidentiality agreements, so no public record exists revealing whether Tom and John received the royalty payments they initially fought for or if they made concessions in order to return. What is known is that they came back for the final episodes of Season 5, welcomed with cautious optimism by the crew and cast.

Although ratings began to climb again during Season 6, the dip had already done its damage. The show’s momentum never fully recovered. Internal confidence at CBS waned, and by the end of Season 7, “The Dukes of Hazzard” ended its run. For Tom and John, the walkout was a high-stakes gamble. Some in Hollywood viewed it as reckless, others as courageous. Their refusal to stay silent about perceived financial injustice set a precedent for television actors seeking more transparency.

What they accomplished remains uncertain. Professionally, both continued to work, but neither would ever again reach the same cultural peak. Financially, the undisclosed terms of their return left fans and industry insiders alike speculating.