MSNBC SHOCKWAVE: Stephanie Ruhle Stuns Viewers with Bizarre Behavior After Live Apology to Tulsi Gabbard—What Did She Really Mean with That Side-Eye? The Internet Explodes as Behind-the-Scenes Secrets Emerge, AP Gets Banned, and Journalistic Integrity Faces a Crisis in Real-Time… You’ll Want to Rewind This One!

Stephanie Ruhle’s Live Apology Leaves Viewers Confused—and Talking: What Really Happened on MSNBC’s 11th Hour?

In a moment that’s taken social media by storm and left the journalism world in a spin, MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle issued a rare, live on-air apology on The 11th Hour—but it wasn’t the apology itself that had everyone buzzing. It was what happened immediately after that raised eyebrows, sparked speculation, and left fans wondering: Was that really sincere?

The controversy started when Ruhle, in a previous broadcast, inaccurately stated that U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard had praised a “good friendship” between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. In reality, Gabbard had been referring to Trump’s relationship with India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as confirmed by the full video of the interview with India’s NDTV.

A Live Correction That Didn’t Land Quite Right

“Last night, we reported that Tulsi Gabbard referred to a friendship between President Trump and Vladimir Putin,” Ruhle said live. “The full clip makes clear she was referencing Indian Prime Minister Modi. We regret the error and have corrected it.”

It was a textbook correction—until Ruhle’s face shifted. A sharp glance to the camera. A tight smile. A subtle eye-roll? Twitter exploded.

→ Swipe to see more articles

Related Posts

Lawrence Jones’ Stunning Rise: Youngest Black

😲 “Tyrus Drops Truth Bomb on The View LIVE: Hosts Left Stunned After He Shatters the ‘Race Narrative’—Social Media Erupts with Divided Reactions! 🔥 Will This Explosive Moment Change Daytime TV Forever?”

Deportation Drama: GOP’s Brandon Gill

Meghan Markle will ‘no doubt’ overtake Princess Catherine in popularity

Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi have kicked off a surprising celebrity trend

😱 Dana Perino’s SHOCKING Behind-the-Scenes Confession STUNS Fox News Fans: Chronic Pain, Emotional Strain, and the Life-Changing Habit That Saved Her 🤯💃📺 You Thought Her Calm Was Effortless? Think Again—This Candid Revelation May Change the Way You See Her FOREVER!

“What was THAT look after the apology? 😬 Did she really mean it?” one viewer posted, racking up thousands of likes in minutes.

Others speculated about tension behind the scenes. “She didn’t want to say that. You could see it in her body language,” another commented. And with MSNBC often critical of the Trump administration, fans began wondering: Was this apology political damage control—or something deeper?

Tulsi Gabbard’s Team Fires Back

Adding fuel to the fire, Gabbard’s spokesperson Alexa Henning slammed the misinformation, calling it “literal fake news” and accusing outlets like the Associated Press of pushing a narrative. “This is why no one trusts the maliciously incompetent and purposefully biased media,” she wrote on X.

The Associated Press, which initially published the false claim, issued its own correction, stating the original story “did not meet our standards.” However, the damage was already done—and now AP finds itself banned from the Oval Office and Air Force One by the Trump administration.

Lawsuit and Fallout

In response, the AP has filed a lawsuit against Trump officials, alleging a violation of First Amendment rights. “This targeted attack on AP’s editorial independence… strikes at the very core of the First Amendment,” the suit argues. The case is already making waves as media watchdogs call it a “landmark moment” in press freedom battles.

Meanwhile, MSNBC’s own internal tensions may be growing. Sources close to the network told Daily Focus that producers were blindsided by how far the apology had to go and that Ruhle “wasn’t happy” about being put on the spot.

What’s Next for MSNBC and Ruhle?

While Ruhle’s apology may have technically corrected the record, the fallout is far from over. Online debates continue about journalistic responsibility, partisan narratives, and whether MSNBC will face further backlash—or even legal pressure—over the false report.

One thing is certain: Stephanie Ruhle’s strange moment after the apology has become symbolic of a larger crisis facing media outlets in 2025—a moment where the line between professionalism and personal frustration isn’t just blurred; it’s playing out live, in front of millions.

And whether you support Gabbard, Ruhle, or just want the truth—this is one media moment no one can ignore.